- Haitians fled their country because of threats. Now, many face similar challenges in Springfield CNN
- Opinion | I’m the Republican Governor of Ohio. Here Is the Truth About Springfield. The New York Times
- Ohio bishops demand respect for migrants’ ‘infinite dignity’ amid viral false claims, threats National Catholic Reporter
- Vivek Ramaswamy finally found a conspiracy theory even he can’t get behind POLITICO
- Ohio GOP Gov. DeWine slams Trump and Vance for baseless claims about Haitian migrants in Springfield ABC News
Day: September 20, 2024
Suspect charged in second assassination attempt against former President Trump The Arab American News
 |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story . |
- Summary
- Ukrainian drone attack hits major Russian arsenal
- Massive blasts detected by earthquake monitors
- NASA picks up multiple heat sources from space
- Some anger expressed in Russia over the attack
LONDON, Sept 18 (Reuters) – A large-scale Ukrainian drone attack on Russia triggered an earthquake-sized blast at a major arsenal in the Tver region on Wednesday, forcing the evacuation of a nearby town, war bloggers and some media reported.
Unverified video and images on social media showed a huge ball of flame blasting into the night sky and multiple detonations thundering across a lake about 380 km (240 miles) west of Moscow.
NASA satellites picked up intense heat sources emanating from an area of about 14 square kilometres (5 square miles) at the site in the early hours and earthquake monitoring stations noted what sensors thought was a small
in the area.
“The enemy hit an ammunition depot in the area of Toropets,” said Yuri Podolyaka, a Ukrainian-born, pro-Russian military blogger. “Everything that can burn is already burning there (and exploding).”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, speaking in his nightly video address, hailed the outcome of the attack without referring specifically to the target.
“A very important result was achieved last night on Russian territory and such actions weaken the enemy,” Zelenskiy said. “I thank everyone involved. Such precision is truly inspiring.”
He thanked the SBU security service, the HUR intelligence service and the Special Operations Forces.
A source in Ukraine’s SBU state security service had earlier told Reuters the drone attack had destroyed a warehouse storing missiles, guided bombs and artillery ammunition.
Russian state media have in the past reported that a major arsenal for conventional weapons was located at the site of the blasts. State media, now subject to military censorship laws, was muted in its reporting on Wednesday.
Igor Rudenya, governor of the Tver region, said that Ukrainian drones had been shot down, that a fire had broken out and that some residents were being evacuated. He did not say what was burning.
One woman told Reuters that members of her family had been evacuated from Toropets.
“A fire started with explosions,” said the woman, who identified herself only as Irina.
Rudenya later said the situation in Toropets was stable as of midday local time (0900 GMT) and that evacuated residents could return. The fire had been put out and there were no recorded fatalities, he said.
Item 1 of 7 Flames rise during an explosion, amid the Russia-Ukraine conflict, in Toropets, Tver region, Russia in this screen grab obtained from a social media video released on September 18, 2024. Social Media/via REUTERS
[1/7]Flames rise during an explosion, amid the Russia-Ukraine conflict, in Toropets, Tver region, Russia in this screen grab obtained from a social media video released on September 18, 2024. Social Media/via REUTERS Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
Russia and Ukraine each reported dozens of enemy drone attacks on their territory overnight, with Russian forces advancing in eastern Ukraine.
MAJOR EXPLOSION
The size of the main blast shown in the unverified social media video was consistent with 200-240 tons of high explosives detonating, said George William Herbert of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey in California.
A Toropets chatroom on the Russian social media site VK was flooded with messages of support from other parts of the country and offers of help to people fleeing the town.
Some people were asking whether buildings at specific addresses were still standing.
“People, does anyone know what’s happened to Kudino village??? They told me nothing is left of our house,” posted one woman.
Another woman replied: “It’s horror there.” Kudino is a village 4.5 km (2.8 miles) northeast of Toropets.
Some war bloggers asked how drones could trigger such large blasts at what was thought to be a highly fortified facility.
According to an RIA state news agency report from 2018, Russia was building an arsenal for the storage of missiles, ammunition and explosives in Toropets, a 1,000-year-old town, with a population of just over 11,000.
Dmitry Bulgakov, then a deputy defence minister, told RIA in 2018 that the facility could defend weapons from missiles and even a small nuclear attack. Bulgakov was arrested earlier this year on corruption charges, which he denies.
“It (the concrete facilities) ensures their reliable and safe storage, protects them from air and missile strikes and even from the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion,” RIA quoted Bulgakov as saying at the time.
Some Russians on chat groups expressed anger.
“Why wasn’t the ammunition underground?! What are you doing???? In Kudino, houses were blown away! Why is the forest burning and no one is there… What kind of negligence is this!!!!” one woman posted.
Russia reported that its air defence units had destroyed 54 drones launched against five Russian regions overnight, without mentioning Tver. Ukraine said it had shot down 46 of 52 drones launched by Moscow overnight and that Russia had used three guided air missiles which did not reach their targets.
The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
Reporting by Lidia Kelly in Melbourne, Lucy Papachristou, Mark Trevelyan and Tom Balmforth in London and Anastasiia Malenko in Kyiv; Additional reporting by Gerry Doyle in Singapore; Writing by Guy Faulconbridge; Editing by Michael Perry, Christian Schmollinger, William Maclean, Gareth Jones, Philippa Fletcher, Ron Popeski and David Gregorio
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
|
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from  Nextgov/FCW – All Content.
|
Incomplete tasks include creating a cyber national guard system, a real-time cyber threat sharing platform, and a national plan for restoring economic functions after a cyber disaster.
An influential cybersecurity policy body says that the federal government has implemented more of its recommendations in the past year but that several hard-hitting items still need completion to better protect the U.S. from nation-state hackers and cybercriminals.
According to the Cyberspace Solarium Commission 2.0 — a continuation of the recommendation body chartered by Congress in 2019 to help guide American cybersecurity policymaking — those objectives include establishing a consistent cybersecurity national guard system, codifying a real-time cyber threat sharing platform for government agencies and creating a nation-wide plan to restore critical economic functions in the event of a cyber disaster.
Another incomplete high-priority item is establishing “benefits and burdens” for systemically important entities that, if disrupted, would create significant negative impact on national security, economic activity or public health and safety if they were to malfunction or be sabotaged.
The recommendations in the annual report from CSC 2.0, stood up in late 2021 after the initial CSC mandate sunset, are aimed at cyber officials in the next presidential administration, with the U.S. guaranteed a presidential transition after President Joe Biden this summer decided to not run for a second term.
“Some of our most important [objectives] are still not done,” said Mark Montgomery, who directs CSC 2.0 with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank, where the body is now housed. Montgomery said he’s been contacted by the Harris and Trump campaign’s presidential transition teams, who asked about ideas the group has put forward.
“Even though we’re at 80% moving along, three or four of our most important ones out of the top 10 are not done,” he said in a call with reporters to preview the findings.
Since last year, there’s been a 10% increase in the implementation or near-implementation of the initial CSC March 2020 recommendations, said Jiwon Ma, a senior policy analyst at FDD’s Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation who helped craft the report.
Of the 82 initial recommendations, almost 80% are either fully implemented or close to it, with an additional 12% making steady progress, she added. This trend is consistent across all 116 recommendations, including those from later recommendation papers, with 80% implemented or nearing completion and another 14% on track for completion.
CSC has been deemed a major force behind contemporary U.S. cyber policy decisions. Members of Congress in the original commission — which included then Reps. Jim Langevin, D-R.I. and Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., as well as Sen. Angus King, I-Maine — formed the backbone that created the Office of the National Cyber Director, which has helped the federal government meet various cyber priorities outlined in a sweeping strategy it unveiled last year.
One area that’s yet to be fulfilled is the creation of House and Senate select committees on cybersecurity, the report says. It’s been an inconsistent miss each year the CSC’s findings have been produced, and Montgomery said that it likely won’t move anywhere soon because there’s no motivation in either chamber or political party to do so.
“We’d have to have a dramatic ‘cyber 9/11’ event where the burning ember of blame is pointed at least partially at Congress for not doing proper oversight,” he added. “That is the only way you would get a provision like that passed.”
tver explosion – Google Search https://t.co/tGP9zidzqY
–https://t.co/UIMe2yIzfJ— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) September 20, 2024
tver explosion – Google Search https://t.co/tGP9zidzqY
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) September 20, 2024
WHEN TOM BOSSERT FIRST HEARD about the Israeli espionage operation that detonated thousands of Hezbollah pagers across Lebanon, he was floored. As president of a leading cyber security firm, Trinity Cyber, and a former top White House homeland security advisor to Donald Trump, Bossert has spent years working on how to defend against cyber intrusions by nation-state actors and terrorist groups. But he had never seen or heard about anything quite as audacious as what the Israelis pulled off this week—apparently setting up a supply chain front company in Hungary and then packing thousands of pagers with tiny but high-powered explosives without Hezbollah leaders having a clue.
“Whatever your views of the violence here, it’s a brilliant set of tradecraft,” he told me in an interview for the SpyTalk podcast. Just how brilliant? “They have introduced fear into every member of Hezbollah, right?” he said. “They [Hezbollah operatives] are looking over their shoulder for years now, thinking that everything they touch might blow up. They’re probably looking at everything they pull out of their pockets and everything that they have in their house and everything that they touch on a daily basis.” It’s the cost of “the internet of things.“
Even Hassan Nasrallah—the Hezbollah leader who in a speech Thursday called the Israeli attack a “massacre” that amounted to an “act of war”—is likely spooked, thinking, “I’m now not trusting people that are in my inner circle because there’s a very good chance” the Israelis have penetrated it, said Bossert.
“I think that Hezbollah right now is not only suffering disruption to their command and control and communications capability, but suffering a massive internal trust problem. And I think that’s exactly what the Israelis wanted,” he added.
But Bossert is not blind to the possible fall-out. There are, of course, the inevitable questions of collateral damage: When the Hezbollah pagers exploded on Tuesday, and then two-way radios on Wednesday, many of the thousands who suffered the consequences were members of the organization’s military and terrorist wings. But there were also civilian casualties, including two small school children, ages 9 and 11.
Two former senior CIA operations officers expressed similar wonderment Wednesday about the terror spectacular, but cautioned in SpyTalk interviews about the political and strategic downside for Israel from the havoc of Lebanon’s civilian casualties.
It was “an extraordinary intelligence accomplishment and an enormous Hezbollah counterintelligence failure,” as retired former senior CIA operations officer Douglas London put it. “But there are questions that need asking: what was the consideration for civilian casualties, if one of these devices detonated on an aircraft in flight?
Wider War?
And whatever disruption the operation achieved to Hezbollah command and control communications, the Israelis also risked a serious escalation on their northern front, especially from Iran, whose ambassador to Lebanon lost one eye and suffered damage in another after his pager exploded.
More broadly, Bossert says, the Israeli op may have unleashed a “Pandora’s Box,” inspiring others to try to replicate the attack while at the same time injecting worldwide fear about the vulnerabilities of handheld devices that adversaries would likely now seek to exploit.
“What type of fear might this spread unintentionally into the rest of the world?” he asks. “At some stage, are there people in the United States afraid to pick up their phone for fear that it’ll blow up on them?”
Bossert, who had been George W. Bush’s deputy homeland security adviser, was recruited to the top spot by Trump and served there for about two years, resigning in April 2018, the day after the president brought aboard John Bolton as his national security adviser. “When a CNBC reporter pointed out that Bossert was seen as one of the most effective people in the Trump administration,” the network reported at the time, “another White House official, also speaking on the condition of anonymity, responded: ‘That was likely the problem.’” In 2020, Bossert wrote a major Op-ed piece for the New York Times warning that officials weren’t paying enough attention to Russia’s hacking of the federal government.
You can listen to the full conversation with Bossert, in which he also lays out how the Israelis likely managed to insert explosives in the devices without detection, in this week’s SpyTalk podcast, out Friday on Simplecast, Apple, or anywhere else you like to listen.
